U of A University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture

Pictures of chickens, flowers, wheat, a boy looking through a magnifying glass, irrigation pipe, soybean pods, and fruits and vegetables.

Cooperative Extension Service

Cooperative Extension Service

Agricultural Experiment Station


Search | Publications | Jobs | Personnel Directory | Links
County Offices | Departments

About Us

Find Us

For the Media

Agriculture

Aquaculture
       & Fisheries

Beef
Beekeeping
Corn
Cotton
Dairy
Forage/Pasture
Forestry
Grain Sorghum
Horses
Horticulture
      Commercial

Poultry
Rice
Soybean
Specialty Agriculture
Swine
Wheat

Links
Newsletters

Business & Communities

Families & Consumers

Health & Nutrition

Home & Garden

Natural Resources

4-H Youth Development

Public Policy Center

For Faculty & Staff

Giving

Dale Bumpers College
of Agricultural, Food &
Life Sciences


Division Home


Agricultural Experiment
      Station Home


Cooperative Extension
      Service Home

 

Forage and Pasture
Forage Management Guides
Self-Study Guide 5: Utilization of Forages by Beef Cattle

Forages in the form of pasture, hay, and silage supply over 80 percent of the nutrients required to produce a beef animal. Since most of the concentrate feed is fed during the finishing phase, forages provide an even higher percentage of nutrients consumed during the cow-calf and stocker phases. In Arkansas, careful management of pastures can result in green forage being available nearly year-round. Allowing cows to harvest the forage themselves from pastures is the most economical and convenient approach to forage management. However, forage stored as hay or silage will be necessary in most operations to support cattle during periods when pasture production is inadequate to meet livestock nutritional needs.

Forage management decisions are always influenced by the need to find an acceptable compromise between yield and forage quality. These two factors require different types of management to be maximized separately. Forage yield (tons per acre) and plant persistence are usually maximized when plants are harvested at mature stages of growth. Forage quality, however, is usually highest when plants are harvested in a young, leafy stage of growth, at which point forage will be high in protein and digestibility and low in fiber. Cattle do not need to eat as much of high quality forage to gain the same amount of weight as when they are fed low quality forage. The producer’s challenge is to manage forages and cattle in a way that optimizes both forage performance (yield, quality, and persistence) and animal performance (weight gain per animal or gain per acre, health, and reproductive performance).

When planning a forage system, the nutritional needs of the cattle being raised must be considered. The producer may decide to match the forages to the desired cattle, or to match the cattle to the existing forages. Production goals for a cow-calf operation include maintaining the cow as inexpensively as possible while supporting good reproductive performance (timely conception, birth of healthy calves) and good milk production that supports high calf weaning weights. Lactating cows require more nutrients than pregnant, non-lactating cows. In general, young cattle (stockers, calves, or replacement heifers) require higher quality forage than mature cows, because they simply cannot physically eat enough low quality forage to meet their nutritional needs for acceptable rates of gain.

The species of forage grown and its method of harvest are major determinants of yield and feed availability. Warm-season forages grow best during summer, while cool-season forages grow best during spring and fall. Perennial forages can provide dependable forage year after year, while annual forages may produce large amounts of high-quality forage, but for relatively short periods of time. Legumes are generally of higher nutritive quality than grasses and can significantly improve the overall forage quality of a pasture if grown in a mixture with grasses. In Arkansas, permanent pastures containing native or improved perennial grasses or legumes are available nearly year-round, and are commonly used in cow-calf operations, and sometimes with stockering (backgrounding). Winter annual temporary pastures are used primarily for stockers, as creeps for calves under fall calving systems, or sometimes for cows. Stockpiling of cool-season grasses is used primarily with cow-calf operations. Green-chop (mechanical harvest and immediate feeding of green forages) is sometimes used in stocker operations. Silage is not often used by Arkansas beef producers, but can have a place in stocker or finishing programs. Hay is used in all types of beef cattle operations.

Grazing Management Systems

Grazing systems offer cattlemen flexible management options for producing and utilizing forage crops efficiently. Grazing requires less machinery, labor, facilities, and expense than the feeding of stored forages. Cattle can harvest forage with minimal help, but for best productivity, the producer must actively manage the pastures. The quantity of forage available and its quality may vary greatly according to forage species, season of the year, weather fluctuations, and grazing management.

Temperature, soil moisture, and fertility are the major factors influencing rate of plant growth and forage quality. Warm-season species like bermudagrass, bahiagrass, dallisgrass, and sorghum-sudangrass grow best during the late spring, summer, and early fall months, and go dormant in the winter. Cool-season forage species like tall fescue, orchardgrass, clovers, ryegrass, and small grains grow best in fall and spring and make little if any growth during summer or the coldest part of winter. In general, a combination of one-third to one-half warm-season forage and one-half to two-thirds cool-season forages on northern Arkansas farms will provide the longest grazing season, while southern Arkansas farms should have a ratio of about one-third cool-season forages to two-thirds warm-season forages.

Warm-season grasses generally have lower forage quality than cool-season forages. The quality difference is in part due to biology of the plants, and in part because warm growing temperatures and long days increase the fiber content of all forages. All forage species grow best when soil moisture is not limiting (either too little or too much), but some species will tolerate drought or poor drainage better than others. Therefore, when new pastures are established on sites with particular problems, careful attention should be paid to insuring a compatible match between the site and the new forage. Applications of fertilizer that are appropriate according to soil test, forage species, and desired level of productivity will enhance yields and can be used to help even out forage supply over the year.

Several aspects of plant physiology and response to defoliation must be understood to manage pastures wisely. The plant leaf is responsible for conducting photosynthesis and exporting nutrients to the crown or root for storage. As such, the leaf is vital to the survival of the plant, but it is also the location of the most nutrients for the grazing animal. If all leaves are removed from the plant, regrowth must be fueled by the stored energy in the crown or roots, which is a relatively slow process. The longer the interval between defoliations for most forages, the more energy the plant can store, and the easier it is to maintain rapid regrowth and stand persistence over the years. Frequent total defoliation will eventually kill most plants. However, because forage plants lose quality rapidly once they begin to flower, the longer the defoliation interval, the lower the forage quality. Lower forage quality will decrease forage intake by cattle, digestibility, and animal performance. Low forage quality also decreases palatability, so animals may not consume all the available forage. Forage species that keep some leaves very close to the ground (like bermudagrass, dallisgrass, tall fescue, and white clover) can tolerate more frequent and closer grazing than can taller forages (like bluestems, johnsongrass, and alfalfa) because animals never get all the leaves.

Choosing the stocking rate of cattle is another compromise decision. Stocking rate refers to the number of cattle carried on the total acres of pasture on the farm. It should not be confused with stocking density, a term used with rotational grazing systems to describe the number of animals per unit pasture area per day of grazing. Highest rates of gain per animal are obtained on low stocking rates, while highest gain per acre may be realized at high stocking rates with low gains on individual animals. Under practical conditions, the most economical stocking rate is usually just above the level that gives best individual animal performance, and will provide good rates of gain with minimal wastage of forage. Since forage yield and quality is changing over the growing season, the optimal stocking rate will also change over time. Producers can compensate for changing forage availability by adding or subtracting animals from a given pasture area, or by changing the area of pasture available to a set number of animals.

Permanent Pastures

Permanent pastures contain mostly perennial grass or legume species that are expected to persist and be productive for many years. These are often found on land that is not suitable for cultivation. Most permanent pastures in Arkansas consist of bermudagrass or tall fescue, with some acreage in bahiagrass, dallisgrass, smooth bromegrass, or orchardgrass. White and red clovers are the most commonly used perennial legumes.

Temporary Pastures

Temporary pastures usually consist of annual forage crops that are grown to provide a specific period of grazing during a time of year when perennial forage is in short supply. Temporary pastures may be produced on prepared cropland. However, most are produced by sod-seeding annual species into perennial grass stands, especially into dormant bermudagrass. The most common temporary pastures in Arkansas are wheat, rye, oats, and/or annual ryegrass, which are utilized during the winter. Newly available bromegrasses, such as Matua, behave as reseeding annuals in Arkansas, and can be used for temporary cool-season pasture. Annual legumes are often added to annual grass mixtures to add protein. Forage crops in the brassica family include turnips, forage rape, and kale, and can provide excellent fall and winter grazing. In summer, sudangrass, sorghum-sudangrass, and pearl millet can be used to provide temporary pasture. Most temporary pasture species have some capacity for regrowth if grazed carefully while in the vegetative stage, but once flowering is initiated, they quickly mature and die.

Continuous Grazing

Continuous grazing is the practice of letting animals have unlimited access to the entire pasture area all of the time. Depending on forage species, soil type, and fertilizer, stocking rates from 1 to 6 acres per cow-calf unit are used. Its main advantage is a low requirement for management time and labor. However, it can be a rather inefficient way to utilize forages. Selection of the right stocking rate is the primary challenge. If the pasture is continually overstocked, animals will not get enough to eat and will perform poorly, preferred forage species may be eliminated from the pasture, and water and soil conservation is affected. If the pasture is always understocked, individual animals may gain very well because they are able to select only the best quality forage to eat, but large amounts of forage growth will be wasted, and weeds tend to become a problem. If an intermediate stocking rate is used, the pasture will often be undergrazed during times of rapid forage growth and overgrazed when forage growth is slow.

These problems can be addressed by adding a bit more management to the continuous grazing system. The producer can adjust stocking rates periodically to better match current forage availability. The pasture can be clipped periodically to remove tall, mature, unpalatable forage and weeds. A temporary fence can be used to exclude animals from part of the pasture when forage is growing too fast for animals to keep up, and hay can be harvested from the excluded area for use during slow pasture growth periods.

Short, rhizomatous forage species that form dense sods are more tolerant of frequent close grazing and are preferred for continuous grazing systems over taller, bunch-forming plants. Common bermudagrass and white clover are two of the best adapted forages for continuous grazing, and should be stocked to maintain a 3 to 5-inch sward height. Evidence from southern Arkansas suggests that bermudagrass may be easier to manage under continuous grazing than under rotational systems because it maintains much better forage quality under frequent grazing.

Rotational Grazing

Rotational grazing is the practice of dividing the pasture area into smaller sections (sometimes called paddocks) and then moving the animals from one paddock to another. In this system, forages are grazed when they are at their optimum compromise of yield and quality and then rested to accumulate regrowth. Animals are usually stocked more heavily in paddocks than in continuous grazing systems. When done correctly this results both in more even grazing (eliminating the need for clipping) and in animals utilizing a greater percentage of the available forage. Typically, hay can be harvested from some of the paddocks during peak growth periods. Availability of relatively low cost electric fencing makes division of large areas into paddocks more affordable, but rotational grazing can also be employed using permanent fences. Potential advantages of rotational grazing over continuous grazing are:

1. improved persistence of desirable forage species as a result of adequate rest periods to recover from grazing and replenish root reserves

2. less forage waste

3. better control of weeds

4. more grazing days per acre (requiring less hay feeding)

5. more even return of manure and urine to the pasture

6. more frequent observation of animals

7. usually a greater total gain per acre.

However, rotational grazing requires more management expertise, time, and a greater investment in fencing and water supplies for the paddock system. Because animals are forced to eat all the forage, they cannot select a high quality diet and often do not gain as much individually as on a continuous grazing system.

Rotational grazing systems can be very simple or very complex. The simplest systems may consist of as few as three relatively large paddocks with animals rotated every week to 10 days, while complex systems may contain 40 or more small paddocks with animals moved every day. The number and size of paddocks needed will be affected by herd size, class of animals, land available for pasture, forage species, available labor, and production goals. In general, the more paddocks used, the higher the forage quality that can be maintained in them. This occurs because animals can be rotated through the paddocks quickly, always using the one nearest to peak quality. If forage is growing too fast for the livestock to keep up with it, forage in the most mature paddocks can be harvested as hay. The length of the rest or regrowth period is the key to keeping the forages growing well. Most pasture plants will require at least a 30-day regrowth period even at peak growth rates, and may require up to 6 weeks to recover from grazing during stressful growing conditions. If there are not enough paddocks to allow this length of rest, plants eventually become depleted of energy, fail to regrow adequately, and the producer may run out of pasture and need to feed hay. Many desirable forage species are very difficult to keep in a pasture under anything other than a rotational system. This includes most of the native and introduced bunchgrasses (switchgrass, Johnsongrass, big bluestem, indiangrass, eastern gamagrass, old world bluestem, and orchardgrass) and some legumes (alfalfa, sericea lespedeza).

Forward grazing is a variation of rotational grazing in which animals are divided into groups depending on nutritional needs. First access to the paddocks is given to the group with highest nutritional needs and potential for gain, such as bred replacement heifers or stockers. They are allowed to select the best quality forage from the paddock, and then they are moved to a second fresh paddock before the first one is completely grazed down. The lower need group, such as cows, is then put into the first paddock to finish grazing it down to the desired stubble height.

Creep Grazing

Creep grazing is a system in which a high quality and a lower quality pasture are side by side. A creep gate allows unweaned calves access to the high-quality pasture while excluding the cows, thus in effect giving the calves a supplement to milk. Versions of creep grazing can be employed in both continuous and rotational systems.

Limit Grazing

In this system, animals are kept on a low quality pasture or dry lot for most of the day, but are allowed access to a high quality pasture (often a temporary or stockpiled pasture) for a few hours per day. This is most often used for dairy cattle, but can be used to supplement frosted warm-season grass pastures for beef cattle. The daily protein requirement of the cattle being fed is often used to determine grazing time on the high quality (high protein) pasture. Other nutrients are supplied by supplementary feeds (hay, silage, or grain). This system can make good use of a limited supply of high quality pasture.

Strip Grazing

In a strip grazing system, animals are only allowed access to enough forage to provide feed for a few days. This system is similar to rotational grazing in that stocking density (in this case controlled by the amount of pasture made available to the animals) is high enough that the cattle will consume most of the available forage during the occupation period, thus decreasing waste but also decreasing the overall nutritive quality of the diet. Access is controlled using temporary electric fencing that is easy to move across the pasture. Strip grazing is most often used with annual, temporary, or stockpiled forages where immediate regrowth is not anticipated. If used on actively growing perennial pastures where regrowth is desired, a backfence should be used to prevent animals from returning to areas already grazed, where they will remove the early regrowth and can damage the stand.

Stockpiling

Stockpiling is the practice of allowing forage to accumulate during late summer and fall for grazing during winter and is also referred to as deferred grazing. Tall fescue is the most commonly stockpiled forage in Arkansas because it produces large amounts of leaves late in the season and holds its forage quality extremely well in cold weather. Fescue can be set aside and stockpiled anytime from August to November. The longer the set-aside period, the more growth will be accumulated. However, stockpiling summer growth of fescue is not recommended because it will contain a higher concentration of toxic fescue endophyte than growth accumulated during cool weather. Growth made in the fall will usually be of higher forage quality than summer growth (because of cooler temperatures) and fall growth can be encouraged by fall fertilization. Stockpiled pastures containing a mix of mature summer growth and fall vegetative growth is suitable for dry, pregnant cows during winter, while forage stockpiled during fall is suitable for lactating cows or stockers. Strip grazing makes for the most efficient use of stockpiled tall fescue, because the forage loses quality rapidly once the canopy is opened up to the weather by the action of grazing and traffic.

Stored Forage

Hay

Hay is the most versatile form of stored feed. It can be made from almost any pasture forage, can be fed to any class of cattle, and is relatively easy to store and handle with a minimum of machinery and buildings compared to other stored feeds. It fits well within a forage management program that includes grazing because most grazing systems can be structured to allow storage of temporary excesses of growth as hay. Hay can also be produced from specialized fields intended solely as hay meadows, which allows the possibility of growing high-yielding forage species or varieties than are better suited for hay than pasture, such as hybrid bermudagrasses. Hay is more easily transported than other stored forages and can be sold as a cash crop to supplement income from the beef operation.

High quality hay is green, leafy, pleasant smelling, high in protein, low in fiber, digestible, palatable, and free of foreign material, weeds, mold, and toxic compounds. Stage of growth at harvest, weather at harvest, fertilizer application, and storage method all influence hay quality. Just as with pasture, forages yield more hay when harvested at mature stages, but forage quality will be lower. Weather can make it difficult to put up hay of optimum quality. Poor drying conditions or rain damage significantly decrease hay quality, and wet soils may make it impossible to get on fields for timely harvests. Forage testing is a vital aspect of identifying forage quality of hays, and can be obtained through the University of Arkansas Diagnostic Laboratory or numerous private labs. Book values for forage quality of different kinds of hay are available and can be used in emergencies. However, these values are averages based on a wide range of samples, and may not be accurate reflections of the quality of specific hay on the farm. Just as with pastures, the highest quality hays should be fed to the animals with the highest nutritional needs.

Storage facilities and type of hay package are keys to insuring that the hay maintains the same forage quality that it had when first made. Hay can be made in small or large rectangular bales, large round bales, or loose stacks. Shortages of labor have made large hay bales attractive as they can be made and handled with a minimum of labor. Large round bales are the most commonly seen form of hay package in Arkansas. Round bales should be stored in a pole barn or building if one is available because protection from weather prevents spoilage of forage in the outside layers. In particular, high-value hays (legumes) or loosely-made bales are best stored inside as they are most susceptible to loss in value due to weathering. Tightly-made round bales will shed water to a degree and can be stored outside. However, when hay is stored outside, there will a loss of quality due to weathering and mold in the outer layers, and this can spoil 5 to 30 percent of the forage in the bale. Losses can be reduced to the low end of this range by getting bales off the ground on pallets, old tires, or a gravel pad in a sunny location, leaving enough room between bales for good air circulation, or by covering bales with plastic. Square bales do not shed water and must be stored inside or under plastic if outside.

Losses are to be expected whenever hay is moved or fed, and include damage by cattle such as trampling and manure contamination. Cattle may consume more hay than they need or refuse to eat some parts of the bale. Once the bale is opened, it is susceptible to weather damage if not consumed quickly, and fragile leaves may shatter. The total loss can be up to 60 percent of the hay when cattle are allowed free access to bales or stacks. Using recommended hay feeding methods can reduce these losses, but labor requirements will be increased. Feeding hay in some kind of bunk or rack reduces losses caused by cattle walking on the forage. Hay rings are a convenient method of restricting access to large round bales. Electric fences can be used to restrict animal access to stacks or bales. Offering a one-day supply of hay at a time reduces waste. This can be accomplished by unrolling large round bales. When possible, the site where hay is fed should be rotated around within pastures, because high animal traffic will quickly destroy the sod around a permanent feeding site. The resulting muddy patch will increase trampling losses of hay. Also, periodically feeding hay on areas of the pastures with low soil fertility will improve fertility by returning manure to those areas. However, if a permanent hay feeding site is chosen for convenience or ease of access, a concrete or gravel pad will help prevent a muddy patch from developing.

Silage

Silage is the product of fermentation of high-moisture forages. It is an acidic preserved product that is stable as long as it is maintained in an airless environment. Silage exposed to air rapidly heats and spoils, so it must be fed in one-day supplies. Silage requires more labor and equipment to feed than hay, and is difficult to sell off the farm. However, it usually has lower field and storage losses than hay. High energy forage crops like corn, small grains, and sorghum are best suited for silage production, but good silage can be made from relatively low-energy grass crops if a small amount of grain is added at ensiling to help support the fermentation.

Traditionally, silage was made in relatively expensive permanent upright or bunker structures that required more equipment and facilities for unloading and feeding out than hay. These structures were rarely used by beef producers. However, current technology has shown that silage can be made in large plastic bags or by encasing high-moisture round bales with plastic. Round bale silage can be harvested, handled, and fed in much the same way as hay. To save labor, silage can be fed directly from bunkers, trenches, or stacks by allowing cattle access to a limited area so that they do not expose more silage to air than they can eat in a day.

Green-Chop

Green-chop is fresh forage that is harvested mechanically and then transported to the cattle for immediate feeding. It can be a useful method of feeding for confined cattle or when a limited amount of fresh forage is available.

Supplementation

Feeding of supplements can sometimes improve the performance of pastured cattle. Even high-quality forage may be deficient in some nutrients, and it is sometimes necessary to feed cattle forages with less than optimum quality. Forage quality of any lot of hay is variable and cannot be accurately determined from average quality values given in books of feeding tables. Accurate laboratory forage testing is vital to knowing exactly which nutrients are deficient so that appropriate and cost-effective supplements can be chosen to meet the nutrient needs of the class of cattle being fed. Forage is often lacking in one or more minerals. These can be supplied easily in solid blocks or loose mineral feeders. Stocker cattle on pasture may gain more weight when fed small amounts (about 0.5 percent of their body weight per day) of a high-energy supplement such as corn. Feeding greater amounts of energy supplements is counterproductive because forage intake can be reduced. Energy supplements may also be beneficial for nursing cows eating mature, low quality pasture or hay. When forages are low in protein, cattle with high nutritional needs may benefit from receiving about one pound per day of a protein supplement such as soybean meal. By-product feeds such as corn gluten feed or soybean hulls can provide economical sources of energy and protein when locally available. Premixed energy/mineral, protein/mineral, and energy/protein/mineral supplements can be purchased from many suppliers. Cost of these should always be carefully considered against the expected benefits and the cost of buying the ingredients separately.

For more information about forage management, contact your county Extension office or refer to one of our publications.

 

Back to Forage Management Guides


© 2006
University of Arkansas
Division of Agriculture
All rights reserved.
Last Date Modified 10/22/2009
Webmaster

University of Arkansas • Division of Agriculture
Cooperative Extension Service
2301 South University Avenue
Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 • USA
Phone (501) 671-2000 • Fax (501) 671-2209
 

MissionDisclaimerEEO
PrivacyFOI